USPS Unacountable

After I posted adverse information on USPS, my whole blog was erased, as I have indicated. I must be doing something right. Perhaps Congress will recognize this travesty and have the Justice Department take a close look at where "Billions" of dolars have gone since it has been Off Budget. Certainly not our Treasury reducing the Budget. It's suppose to be the United States Postal SERVICE, not Business. More to come.




Floyd W. Lamore
6740 ½ 69th avenue
Pinellas Park, Florida 33781
Ph# 727-289-5618
E-Mail: cllgpkkd@gmail.com
Thursday April 16, 2009
President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President: First may I congratulate you on becoming our Nation’s 44th Chief Executive. I firmly believe you offer more real and substantive hope to America and the World than anyone to occupy the position since John F. Kennedy. I recognize the various and staggering problems you inherited from the previous occupant. I also admire the confidence you display with your Administration in believing you can and will, resolve to the degree possible, these problems. This positive attitude is contagious and welcome.

Briefly, let me tell you about myself. I am proud to say I was born in our Nation’s capitol in1949. My family moved to Georgia until my mother passed when I was nine. I then went to live with my father’s Mother in College Park, Maryland, home of the beautiful University of Maryland. I have much affinity and heritage from College Park in that my Grandmother’s two brothers built College Park proper. I had food, shelter and clothing and love. I started odd jobs for spending money by among other things, selling cokes at U. of Md. Home games and D.C. Stadium (RFK) sport events. At 18, my step mother got me to take the Civil Service Exam to be a mailman. I was hired that November and after a stint in the Naval Air (Phantom Squadron VF-84) I returned to being a letter carrier and going to Junior College evenings in hopes of going to UMD one day. I must tell you old school mailmen held a deep pride in their job of delivering peoples’ personal business and correspondence to their doorstep through rain, sleet, snow or the gloom of night. We knew our patrons and were the eyes and ears of our route and community. During my military absence Letter Carriers struck for better wages and conditions. This resulted in the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970 which among the provisions, gave Postal Employee Craft the right to collective bargaining and removed the Post Master General from a Cabinet position. At the time, it seemed a good deal for all. One day my letter of acceptance to UMD came, culminating a life long dream. In short, I was drawn to participate in Campus activity and also extra-curricular efforts involving lobbying Congress on an issue of National importance. Although my relative contributions as a Vet student at The University of Maryland pale in comparison to your wonderful work, I believe if you had knew more of my background, I would earn some of your respect.

But this letter is not about me. It is about the United States Postal Service and the National Association of Letter Carriers. I came to Florida in 1978, started a family and worked hard construction until 1987 when I was re-hired by USPS. My Union found out I could read and write and asked me to be the District’s Legislative Liaison and alternate Shop Steward. As Liaison I worked closely with Congressman Bill Young’s Office on
-2-
pertinent matters and wrote a column each month for my Local Branch 1477’s newsletter and the state one also. During my 12 year tenure delivering mail in Pinellas Park, Florida I am proud to say I was elected by my NALC peers as a paid delegate to the odd year State Conventions and the even year National Conventions nine consecutive times. In the late 1980’s the main agenda item for the allegedly adverse relationship between USPS and NALC was their common desire to have Congress pass a Bill taking USPS off the Budget. Basically this would leave USPS virtually unaccountable by the Office of Management and Budget and on the grand scale, no oversight financially or otherwise. (See Attachment #1) It gained passage, thus USPS Revenue no longer posits into our Treasury. The Postal Service has been a cash cow with unknown beneficiaries. In a lame duck session of the 109th Congress, in the wee hours of December 9th, 2006, the Senate slipped through the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act which was signed by President George Bush on !2/20/06. (See Attachment #2) The signing picture showed an unhealthy combination of Members of Congress, USPS and NALC all reveling in the successful unanimous consent under the cloak of darkness. No Quorum. No roll call.

As you know from reading Attachment #1, written by a member of the Postal Rate Commission, there is no oversight governing USPS activity to include the Postal Regulatory Commission, Securities and Exchange or Federal Trade. In the early 1990’s, a cult of personality developed in management which was designed to make life a living hell for craft employees. It utilized hiring young aggressive people who wanted to be in supervision. After the 90 day trial period, many would show up on day 91 wearing a suit or fashionable attire with a clipboard in hand. Their instructions were to find fault whenever wherever possible with Carriers (all craft) and utilize discipline. The methods were insidious and the result destroyed many lives and families. Under the grievance process one may hold a meeting between them and their direct supervisor. A deal is usually offered such as a Letter of Warning. Step Two is strictly negotiated by a Union Representative and USPS. If it fails, the case is sent to arbitration which backlogged to nine months to a year. If suspension was the penalty, no matter how inconsequential the infraction was, the carrier had to sit out with no pay and much concern. The degree of genuine effort NALC would exercise in these hearings was proportionate to that carrier’s standing with his local, or in my case, National. Bear in mind, from the Conventions, I could confirm the practice was everywhere. When I went through Union channels asking them to have Congress intervene, the answer was always, “we will handle it in house”.

Commensurate with this terror was the drive of USPS to force mail automation into operation prematurely. The central feature was having letter mail bar coded and delivered to carriers in Delivery Point Sequence (DPS). Management would not let carriers case this mail to cull out forwarding or hold mail. We were simply ordered to take the trays directly to the street for delivery. USPS allegedly came up with a figure of around 65% DPS processed daily. They also bounced various figures of money saved. To hell with mail not to be delivered (hold mail, checks to be forwarded etc…). I authored a number of resolutions, contractual and political, all passing unanimously. The 1994 NALC National Convention in Atlantic City held a contractual resolution I wrote asking NALC to negotiate into the next Contract a provision allowing carriers on a route by route,
-3-
office by office basis to decide whether to case or carry DPS for delivery. In debate, the current NALC President, William Young, then V.P, took the mike during the discussion and pleaded with the plenary to allow DPS to go forward, unrestricted per USPS. He was booed down. I still have the video. Later, at the Florida State Convention, I asked for a copy of the minutes of this bargaining point. I never received it. Oh, by the way, this, like many other Contracts, met impasse and went to Arbitration. (See Attachment #3) I am only touching the surface of this deliberate and well orchestrated effort to control our Postal SERVICE and channel its revenue away from the Government. One avenue of investment surfaced in March of 2009 when it was made public USPS was buying homes in the $500,000 to 1.5 million dollar range for managers transferring to other assignments (See Attachment #4). It has always been a business practice to financially assist in moving employees. But to buy houses for government managers with revenue which should be aiding our budget deficit is obscene. Which makes one wonder has USPS been in the real estate business all along? Who knows? At the moment, a very important branch of our government is totally unaccountable. In the scenario of an infrastructure break down, USPS should be our most reliable form of communication.

Attachment #5 deals with reasons for Privatizing our Postal SERVICE (not business). The paradox is a close reading reveals planned obsolescence as a paper tiger to gain the goal. One should question the intelligence, motivation or both, of those responsible and hold them accountable. In 1976 (I believe), USPS guaranteed overnight delivery in the Continental United States of First Class Mail deposited at your Post Office before noon. Where and how has this ingeniously timed technology diminished? USPS claims a revenue gain of 2.3 Billion in 2007 with both management and union crediting the 2006 bargained contract. Now Post Master Potter has his hat out to Congress begging for a bailout due to loss in 2008. He is asking for incredible measures to include reducing delivery fro six to five days. He also wants to abolish numerous routes (jobs) due to mail volume loss. Obviously, there is less advertising because of our economic woes, but these requests are not bright solutions, only what they have been seeking all along. Mail volume will pick back up with our recovery. Their claim of the Internet usurping billing and payment is exaggerated. What percentage of Americans actually own computers and understand on line viewing and payment. Plus the cost for each transaction far exceeds the cost of a stamp.

I actually began this effort of exposing USPS for their nefarious un- American scam by writing the St. Petersburg Times to answer a stringer column it picked up by The Washington Post/AP misinformation pro USPS story. Then the Times had a credible integral weekly columnist write a follow up story. I wrote a detailed letter to her but she was not allowed to print a follow up. Then the Times printed two Letters to the Editor supporting their position. I wrote a Letter to the Editor briefly detailing three obvious lies USPS had spawned to no avail. I spoke with the Editor who oversees which opinion sees print. He had no real answers for refusing to print an opposing opinion other than Letters to the Editor should be “factual”. I casually mentioned LTTE has always been opinion and the two weeks following my effort contained ludicrous mulch. I also enclosed Attachment # 6 for his perusal. It is in my estimation, the most courageous and poignant
-4-
a president has given. I encompassed it with background creating an article to give one perspective surrounding its significance. The speech was a month after the Bay of Pigs fiasco given to the American Newspaper Publishers Association. JFK was making an obvious effort to negate Operation Mockingbird’s influence in what information our public should be afforded. Unfortunately, the bad guys still prevail. The day after I posted my detailed Letter to the St. Pete Times, my whole blog of articles was erased and blocked so I cannot reprise it under any E-mail etc….The move just exemplifies how important USPS considers what is at stake. Billions.

I recognize there is no good time to pay attention to problems, especially today. But this travesty could be easily corrected with public knowledge bringing about the benefit of service deserved and billions in Government coffers. A Justice Department inquiry would be a virtual and spiritual bonus for President Obama’s new Administration’s credibility. How? In 1978, USPS ordered all new houses/developments to have curbside delivery. This was to make routes longer and save time. The safest place for your mail is at your doorstep, which we had been paid to do. Why should the elderly and disabled have to walk a quarter mile to see if their mail has been delivered so the greedy can buy more houses? Obviously, rural delivery is necessary, but for the most part, city delivery should not have this jeopardy of easy theft and unnecessary encumbrance. USPS is a service not a business. We need legislation putting it back under OMB constraints and giving the Postal Regulatory Commission integral teeth. City stick box delivery needs to be eliminated and DPS cased to reassure errorless timely delivery. Save jobs and preserve one of our oldest most dignified, respected and reliable Institutions. Purge this cult of greedy personality and the NALC will adjust itself worthy of honest representation.

Please take the time to read this carefully and give our President an opportunity to rectify the best kept secret in government of our generation. It should be so simple. Mail a letter, have it transported and leave your local carrier alone to get it to you. Do away with this GPS tracking check system every hour of those Letter Carriers who have already been well vetted as honest trust worthy Americans. They will deliver. I know. I was one and it was the best job I ever held.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Yours in patriotism,



Floyd W. Lamore

______________________

Floyd W. Lamore
6740 ½ 69th avenue
Pinellas Park, Florida 33781
Ph# 727-289-5618
E-Mail: cllgpkkd@gmail.com
Friday April 24, 2009

PAUL TASH
Editor, St. Petersburg Times
490 1st Avenue South
St. Petersburg, Fl. 33701

Dear Sir: I would like to congratulate you on running Florida’s best newspaper and the last two, of the many Pulitzer Prize Awards your paper has been awarded. From such a small market you have grown with the area maintaining an enviable standard. Having been from College Park Maryland, home of the University of Maryland, I cut my teeth on the Washington Post. While in the service, my parents, poor as they were and knowing of my love to read it, gifted me with a subscription to the Post, sent overseas for my benefit. When I moved here in1978, I immediately recognized, to my genuine surprise and content, comparisons in proficiency and stance with the Post. It made my mornings.

Unfortunately, I can not give your paper the same grade for the three times I have been involved. The first issue was in the 1980’s involving an elderly couple, a common felon and murder, which the reporter turned into a May December romance. Years later, through a married couple who were close friends of mine, gained knowledge of the case through incidental discussion of the reporter who had just won a Pulitzer Prize.. Knowing him, they discussed the incident (after reading my saved articles) with him. He sadly admitted to them he had indeed, gotten “it wrong”. I had even pleaded with, now one of your leading Editors, about digging a bit deeper on the follow up article, to no avail.

The second issue involved a criminal matter which I was framed by my girlfriend’s family. I had all the confidence in the world with the columnist I contacted, because of his generally exhibited acumen and knowledge of topic. His first column seemed fair which made me believe my case just might expose the travesty of our so called Criminal Justice System. Had he wrote objectively, I believe it could have been Pulitzer material. But his trial coverage and follow up gave the view of a bad soap opera. This is not my opinion, but that of those I’ve consulted, for comparison and contrast, to include a journalist. All were given copies of my pleadings, discovery, depositions and disparate court rulings along with my alibi. My slant is a bit more harsh. I ate a year and a day rather than plead out for six months, as most common criminals do while the Court ignored my Post Conviction Pleadings, including one denied by the original judge AFTER I had him disqualified. Mr. Tash, you really should have had to sit in my shoes to glean the full carefully constructed injustice and see how you hold up in State Prison. “Justice and just us” as my old lawyer girlfriend and Public Defender father would utter. If you are still reading, I would never have wasted anymore of my time, but one more item before I get to why I even bothered. Your paper did a story on the Pinellas County
-2-
Jail last year with a ringer. How can you honestly expect to gain objective reality when you alert the gate keeper so your boy gets put in probably the safest minimum security unit with the most fragile of inmates ready to BS the paint off the walls? If you really wanted to know why so many inmates come out dead and other nefarious and sundry daily behavior you would logically ask someone who has real experience or a reporter with …..

My reason for writing you is your paper refuses to allow both sides of a very important matter to be printed. There are two attachments which shed light on the subject matter at hand. The issue is in February you published an article, column and several letters to the Editor favoring the United States Postal Service. I wrote several times to have the disinformation (intentional or not) and untruths corrected in an effort to expose the unethical and criminal activity the USPS has been engaging in for over twenty years.
Finally, I spoke with Mr. Lasker, an editor for LTTE. He had no real grasp on the issue or its merits, just, “We only print factual Letters to the Editor”. I replied, from time immemorial, Letters to a paper are one’s opinion. I had monitored the daily input during the interim. You have no Ombudsman and no competition so it’s obvious you can be arbitrary with what you want people to know. This is not Journalism. It’s called propaganda. I challenge you on the merit of my facts to debate me or print my view. You won’t and I’d have to invoke Project Mockingbird’s update as the reason. Why else are you so afraid to give a single person an opportunity to have his voice heard, not stifled? When people have the truth, you can count on them to make an objective reasonable decision. This is more so when it’s a matter of national interest or security. Back when I was idealistic and naïve, I used to say I question one’s intelligence or motivation. Well, I no longer question the medias’ intelligence. Jefferson said he would choose a free press over government. I can only speculate what our Founding Father’s, who sacrificed “Our Lives, Our Fortunes and Our Sacred Honor”, would say about how our country has been undermined by the agenda of political expediency? And the millions who have given their last full measure for true lies? In vain. Must be a lot at stake to keep one person shut up and criticism is one tough hombre. Mr. Tash, if you’re still here, take a step back and think about what privilege and opportunity you have being born an American. Fortune requires obligation. Try the high road, truth is a wonderful thing. I have no hope this letter will change one thing, but if one doesn’t try no change can occur. We all deserve better. Or there is no hope for a truly free society. Only make believe. A last thought for your consideration. Disabled and recovering from a bad accident, I have spent the last two years researching and writing a blog on true political history. Four weeks ago, the day after I published my USPS article my whole blog was systematically erased and made prohibitive of re-issue. As of now, I am incapable of reaching readers of my work. Censorship tells one they must have been doing something right. I will continue to seek and spread truth. From my point of view, there is no alternative.
Thank You,
Floyd Lamore





Floyd W. Lamore
6740 ½ 69th avenue
Pinellas Park, Florida 33781
Ph# 727-289-5618
E-Mail: cllgpkkd@gmail.com
Friday April 24, 2009

PAUL TASH
Editor, St. Petersburg Times
490 1st Avenue South
St. Petersburg, Fl. 33701

Dear Sir: I would like to congratulate you on running Florida’s best newspaper and the last two, of the many Pulitzer Prize Awards your paper has been awarded. From such a small market you have grown with the area maintaining an enviable standard. Having been from College Park Maryland, home of the University of Maryland, I cut my teeth on the Washington Post. While in the service, my parents, poor as they were and knowing of my love to read it, gifted me with a subscription to the Post, sent overseas for my benefit. When I moved here in1978, I immediately recognized, to my genuine surprise and content, comparisons in proficiency and stance with the Post. It made my mornings.

Unfortunately, I can not give your paper the same grade for the three times I have been involved. The first issue was in the 1980’s involving an elderly couple, a common felon and murder, which the reporter turned into a May December romance. Years later, through a married couple who were close friends of mine, gained knowledge of the case through incidental discussion of the reporter who had just won a Pulitzer Prize.. Knowing him, they discussed the incident (after reading my saved articles) with him. He sadly admitted to them he had indeed, gotten “it wrong”. I had even pleaded with, now one of your leading Editors, about digging a bit deeper on the follow up article, to no avail.

The second issue involved a criminal matter which I was framed by my girlfriend’s family. I had all the confidence in the world with the columnist I contacted, because of his generally exhibited acumen and knowledge of topic. His first column seemed fair which made me believe my case just might expose the travesty of our so called Criminal Justice System. Had he wrote objectively, I believe it could have been Pulitzer material. But his trial coverage and follow up gave the view of a bad soap opera. This is not my opinion, but that of those I’ve consulted, for comparison and contrast, to include a journalist. All were given copies of my pleadings, discovery, depositions and disparate court rulings along with my alibi. My slant is a bit more harsh. I ate a year and a day rather than plead out for six months, as most common criminals do while the Court ignored my Post Conviction Pleadings, including one denied by the original judge AFTER I had him disqualified. Mr. Tash, you really should have had to sit in my shoes to glean the full carefully constructed injustice and see how you hold up in State Prison. “Justice and just us” as my old lawyer girlfriend and Public Defender father would utter. If you are still reading, I would never have wasted anymore of my time, but one more item before I get to why I even bothered. Your paper did a story on the Pinellas County
-2-
Jail last year with a ringer. How can you honestly expect to gain objective reality when you alert the gate keeper so your boy gets put in probably the safest minimum security unit with the most fragile of inmates ready to BS the paint off the walls? If you really wanted to know why so many inmates come out dead and other nefarious and sundry daily behavior you would logically ask someone who has real experience or a reporter with …..

My reason for writing you is your paper refuses to allow both sides of a very important matter to be printed. There are two attachments which shed light on the subject matter at hand. The issue is in February you published an article, column and several letters to the Editor favoring the United States Postal Service. I wrote several times to have the disinformation (intentional or not) and untruths corrected in an effort to expose the unethical and criminal activity the USPS has been engaging in for over twenty years.
Finally, I spoke with Mr. Lasker, an editor for LTTE. He had no real grasp on the issue or its merits, just, “We only print factual Letters to the Editor”. I replied, from time immemorial, Letters to a paper are one’s opinion. I had monitored the daily input during the interim. You have no Ombudsman and no competition so it’s obvious you can be arbitrary with what you want people to know. This is not Journalism. It’s called propaganda. I challenge you on the merit of my facts to debate me or print my view. You won’t and I’d have to invoke Project Mockingbird’s update as the reason. Why else are you so afraid to give a single person an opportunity to have his voice heard, not stifled? When people have the truth, you can count on them to make an objective reasonable decision. This is more so when it’s a matter of national interest or security. Back when I was idealistic and naïve, I used to say I question one’s intelligence or motivation. Well, I no longer question the medias’ intelligence. Jefferson said he would choose a free press over government. I can only speculate what our Founding Father’s, who sacrificed “Our Lives, Our Fortunes and Our Sacred Honor”, would say about how our country has been undermined by the agenda of political expediency? And the millions who have given their last full measure for true lies? In vain. Must be a lot at stake to keep one person shut up and criticism is one tough hombre. Mr. Tash, if you’re still here, take a step back and think about what privilege and opportunity you have being born an American. Fortune requires obligation. Try the high road, truth is a wonderful thing. I have no hope this letter will change one thing, but if one doesn’t try no change can occur. We all deserve better. Or there is no hope for a truly free society. Only make believe. A last thought for your consideration. Disabled and recovering from a bad accident, I have spent the last two years researching and writing a blog on true political history. Four weeks ago, the day after I published my USPS article my whole blog was systematically erased and made prohibitive of re-issue. As of now, I am incapable of reaching readers of my work. Censorship tells one they must have been doing something right. I will continue to seek and spread truth. From my point of view, there is no alternative.
Thank You,
Floyd Lamore





Floyd W. Lamore
6740 ½ 69th avenue
Pinellas Park, Florida 33781
Ph# 727-289-5618
E-Mail: cllgpkkd@gmail.com
Friday April 24, 2009

PAUL TASH
Editor, St. Petersburg Times
490 1st Avenue South
St. Petersburg, Fl. 33701

Dear Sir: I would like to congratulate you on running Florida’s best newspaper and the last two, of the many Pulitzer Prize Awards your paper has been awarded. From such a small market you have grown with the area maintaining an enviable standard. Having been from College Park Maryland, home of the University of Maryland, I cut my teeth on the Washington Post. While in the service, my parents, poor as they were and knowing of my love to read it, gifted me with a subscription to the Post, sent overseas for my benefit. When I moved here in1978, I immediately recognized, to my genuine surprise and content, comparisons in proficiency and stance with the Post. It made my mornings.

Unfortunately, I can not give your paper the same grade for the three times I have been involved. The first issue was in the 1980’s involving an elderly couple, a common felon and murder, which the reporter turned into a May December romance. Years later, through a married couple who were close friends of mine, gained knowledge of the case through incidental discussion of the reporter who had just won a Pulitzer Prize.. Knowing him, they discussed the incident (after reading my saved articles) with him. He sadly admitted to them he had indeed, gotten “it wrong”. I had even pleaded with, now one of your leading Editors, about digging a bit deeper on the follow up article, to no avail.

The second issue involved a criminal matter which I was framed by my girlfriend’s family. I had all the confidence in the world with the columnist I contacted, because of his generally exhibited acumen and knowledge of topic. His first column seemed fair which made me believe my case just might expose the travesty of our so called Criminal Justice System. Had he wrote objectively, I believe it could have been Pulitzer material. But his trial coverage and follow up gave the view of a bad soap opera. This is not my opinion, but that of those I’ve consulted, for comparison and contrast, to include a journalist. All were given copies of my pleadings, discovery, depositions and disparate court rulings along with my alibi. My slant is a bit more harsh. I ate a year and a day rather than plead out for six months, as most common criminals do while the Court ignored my Post Conviction Pleadings, including one denied by the original judge AFTER I had him disqualified. Mr. Tash, you really should have had to sit in my shoes to glean the full carefully constructed injustice and see how you hold up in State Prison. “Justice and just us” as my old lawyer girlfriend and Public Defender father would utter. If you are still reading, I would never have wasted anymore of my time, but one more item before I get to why I even bothered. Your paper did a story on the Pinellas County
-2-
Jail last year with a ringer. How can you honestly expect to gain objective reality when you alert the gate keeper so your boy gets put in probably the safest minimum security unit with the most fragile of inmates ready to BS the paint off the walls? If you really wanted to know why so many inmates come out dead and other nefarious and sundry daily behavior you would logically ask someone who has real experience or a reporter with …..

My reason for writing you is your paper refuses to allow both sides of a very important matter to be printed. There are two attachments which shed light on the subject matter at hand. The issue is in February you published an article, column and several letters to the Editor favoring the United States Postal Service. I wrote several times to have the disinformation (intentional or not) and untruths corrected in an effort to expose the unethical and criminal activity the USPS has been engaging in for over twenty years.
Finally, I spoke with Mr. Lasker, an editor for LTTE. He had no real grasp on the issue or its merits, just, “We only print factual Letters to the Editor”. I replied, from time immemorial, Letters to a paper are one’s opinion. I had monitored the daily input during the interim. You have no Ombudsman and no competition so it’s obvious you can be arbitrary with what you want people to know. This is not Journalism. It’s called propaganda. I challenge you on the merit of my facts to debate me or print my view. You won’t and I’d have to invoke Project Mockingbird’s update as the reason. Why else are you so afraid to give a single person an opportunity to have his voice heard, not stifled? When people have the truth, you can count on them to make an objective reasonable decision. This is more so when it’s a matter of national interest or security. Back when I was idealistic and naïve, I used to say I question one’s intelligence or motivation. Well, I no longer question the medias’ intelligence. Jefferson said he would choose a free press over government. I can only speculate what our Founding Father’s, who sacrificed “Our Lives, Our Fortunes and Our Sacred Honor”, would say about how our country has been undermined by the agenda of political expediency? And the millions who have given their last full measure for true lies? In vain. Must be a lot at stake to keep one person shut up and criticism is one tough hombre. Mr. Tash, if you’re still here, take a step back and think about what privilege and opportunity you have being born an American. Fortune requires obligation. Try the high road, truth is a wonderful thing. I have no hope this letter will change one thing, but if one doesn’t try no change can occur. We all deserve better. Or there is no hope for a truly free society. Only make believe. A last thought for your consideration. Disabled and recovering from a bad accident, I have spent the last two years researching and writing a blog on true political history. Four weeks ago, the day after I published my USPS article my whole blog was systematically erased and made prohibitive of re-issue. As of now, I am incapable of reaching readers of my work. Censorship tells one they must have been doing something right. I will continue to seek and spread truth. From my point of view, there is no alternative.
Thank You,
Floyd Lamore

Nine-one-one truth

All my articles have been erased and someone is blocking my capability to Publish. Can anyone help with my freedom speech snd unblock this nefarious effort to keep the truth from flowing. "nine-one-one truth"